Celsia Capital advises hedge funds, multi-strats, and sophisticated asset managers on allocation, sourcing, and underwriting in one of the last truly uncorrelated alternative asset classes.
Litigation finance has matured into a credible alternative asset class with institutional sponsors, secondary trading, and increasingly sophisticated structures.
And yet, capital allocators face a familiar problem: access without insight, or insight without access. The funds with the best origination rarely have capacity for new partners. The funds with capacity often lack the underwriting depth to clear an institutional investment committee.
Celsia exists in the gap between them. We work alongside institutional investors and the managers they back — translating between legal, financial, and fiduciary languages — so that capital is deployed where it can be both underwritten and rewarded.
Our practice is grounded in a simple conviction: the strongest litigation portfolios are built the same way as the strongest credit portfolios — through rigorous sourcing, disciplined diligence, and patient structuring.
We work for the allocator. No origination fees from funded matters, no conflicts with sponsors. Our incentives are measured in long-term returns, not transaction volume.
Most of our work is bilateral and confidential. We do not publish league tables. We do not announce mandates. Our reputation is built one room at a time.
A decade of underwriting matters across commercial litigation, mass torts, IP, and international arbitration — with relationships at the very top of the trial bar and Fortune 200 legal departments.
Litigation outcomes are not quarterly. We help build portfolios — and term sheets — that reflect the time horizon of the underlying assets, keeping both parties aligned for the long term success of the investments.
We work with allocators across the litigation finance investment lifecycle — from initial allocation strategy through portfolio construction, secondary positioning, and exit.
For institutional investors building or expanding exposure to legal assets, from a first commitment to a programmatic allocation.
Differentiated access to single-case, portfolio, and law-firm-receivable transactions through long-standing relationships at the trial bar.
Independent merits and recovery analysis with the financial structuring discipline institutional investment committees require.
A decade ago, litigation finance was a curiosity at the edge of alternative credit. Today, it is an institutional market with dedicated sponsors, secondary buyers, and a growing role inside multi-strategy and private credit portfolios.
The opportunity, however, is no longer simply "discovery." The opportunity is discrimination: distinguishing well-underwritten matters from poorly-priced ones, durable sponsors from one-cycle managers, and structurally sound facilities from concentrated risk dressed in attractive headline returns.
That is the work we do — every day, for every allocator we serve.
Indicative composite of allocator conversations over the trailing twelve months. Not investment advice.
Kelly Daley founded Celsia Capital to do the work she had spent a decade preparing for: connecting institutional capital with legal assets, on terms that respect both.
For the past decade, Kelly was a Managing Director at Burford Capital and Gerchen Capital Partners, where she was responsible for sourcing and executing new investments — focused on corporate finance secured by contingent legal assets. Along the way she developed lasting relationships with the trial bar, Fortune 200 legal departments, and the institutional allocators who back them.
Before she entered the litigation finance industry, Kelly was a senior litigator at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, where her practice focused on the litigation needs of media and technology companies — intellectual property litigation, contract disputes, content protection, and product liability. She had previously worked at MoloLamken LLP and McDermott Will & Emery, and served as Law Clerk to the Honorable D. Michael Fisher on the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Selected commentary on the state of litigation finance, drawn from our work with institutional allocators and the sponsors they back.
Why programmatic commitments are increasingly the default for institutional capital — and what allocators give up when they take the low-risk path.
What the emerging secondary market tells us about transaction transparency, asset value standardization, and the long-run institutionalization of litigation finance.
A practical framework for translating legal-merits analysis into the loss-given-default and recovery vocabulary an investment committee will recognize.
We work with a small number of institutional clients at any one time. Inquiries from allocators, sponsors, and law firms are welcome and held in confidence.